Results of Wexford Technology Studies:
A 10 Year Review
Over the
last decade, Wexford has conducted research and evaluation studies
related to teacher and student development of 21st Century Learning
Skills for global learning and working. Included in those skills
are using technology for teaching and learning – lifelong
learning skills and achievement in the content areas. Included
in the summary of findings is information from studies at the
university level, at the K-12 level, and studies about online
resources for teachers and students.
At the
university level, studies focused on programs about faculty professional
development, course redesign to effectively use technology, and
programs for preservice students. Studies included:
- Intel Teach to the Future Pre-Service Pilot Training
Program
- Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to use Technology
(PT3) Projects
- Ohio PDA Project
At the
K-12 level, programs focused both on professional development
(online and onsite) for teachers, and on student learning. Studies
included:
- Middle School Math Teachers - Preferences Related
to Online Professional Development
- The MATRIX Star Schools
Distance Learning and Mobile Technologies Project
- The MathStar
Star Schools Program
- Technology Integration Challenge Grant
- Regional Technology
in Education Consortia - HPR*TEC and PSR*TEC
- E2T2 State Technology
Competitive Grants - KS, NV
- Texas Intel Teacher Training
Other
studies focused on online resources for teachers and students
created by Quantum Simulations (Artificial Intelligence Assessors & Tutors,
http://www.quantumsimulations.com,
and the ALTEC (University of Kansas) Tools at http://www.altec.org.
Many of the studies focused on better understanding strategies
to increase faculty and teachers use of technology. In those
studies we found six factors linked to increase use of technology
by teachers and faculty (which in most cases also meant increased
use by students). A description of those factors are provided
below.
|
Motivate
Faculty and Teachers to Use Technology |
|
• |
Teachers and faculty must
see the benefits of the use of technology. |
|
•
|
They need examples of substantive
uses of technology in their content areas -- how to use technology
to teach concepts that are hard to teach or hard to learn. |
|
•
|
Their benefits and incentives must
outweigh what individuals see as “costs” of adopting
technology -- time, energy, material resources. |
| |
|
|
|
|
Create
a Community of Learners |
| |
• |
Include learners from inside and outside
of the organization |
| |
|
|
|
|
Provide
Structured Training |
| |
• |
Use practices based on research on professional
development |
| |
|
~ |
http://www.wexford.org/evidence/index.html |
| |
|
~ |
http://www.aera.net/ |
| |
• |
Link training to prior knowledge related
to |
| |
|
~ |
Technology skills |
| |
|
~ |
Use of technology for teaching and learning |
| |
|
|
|
|
Establish
Support Systems |
| |
• |
Mentoring |
| |
• |
Just in Time training and support |
| |
• |
Technical support |
| |
|
|
|
|
Create Tools
that Meet Specific Needs of Faculty, Teachers, Administrators,
Students, and Parents |
| |
• |
ALTEC |
| |
• |
Quantum Simulations - artificial intelligence
tutors and assessors |
| |
|
|
|
|
Create
Systemic Linkages |
| |
• |
K-12 and University Partnerships |
| |
• |
District-School-Community Collaboration |
| top |
|
|
|