BACK |
| |
|
|
|
Organizational
Change Tools: Creating and Sustaining Organizational Change |
| |
Use a synthesis of over 30 years
of research to plan for, create and assess systemwide change.
Develop an understanding of the readiness that exists within
an agency to support a new initiative and whether or not the
new initiative, once implemented, is being adopted and sustained. |
| |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
Introduction to
The Organizational Change Planning and Review Tools |
| |
|
The Organizational Change Planning
and Review Tools are two complementary tools: Creating
Change and Indicators of
Sustained Change. These tools will assist you to identify
specific characteristics and elements of your own organization
related to creating change at any point in time – before,
during or after a project implementation effort. These characteristics,
based on findings from the organizational change literature,
highlight an organization’s readiness to accept, adopt
and sustain change. Using these tools can help you work toward
successful change by identifying where your organization
is well positioned and ready for change, and where some additional
work is needed to help prepare the organization for change.
The tools also help you identify when your organization has
adopted and is beginning to sustain the change or innovation.
These tools can be used at a variety of times and in a variety
of ways to help plan your project and identify both strengths
and weaknesses during implementation. By rating each element
along a five-point Rating Scale, you can quickly see where
your organization is ready to meet the challenge of change,
and where additional work needs to be done to ensure that
positive change occurs. The first tool, Creating Change has
two components. The first component, Elements of the Current
Organizational Climate/Culture, offers descriptors of what
an organization can look like, particularly before an innovation
or new program has been introduced. The second component, “Fit” of
Proposed Change into Current Organization, examines the match
between the new program or innovation and the existing organizational
culture. The second tool, the Indicators of Sustained Change,
identifies characteristics that indicate a change or innovation
has been embraced into the regular practice of an organization. |
| top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Who
Should Use the Change Tools? |
| |
|
Project leaders, administrators, evaluators,
participants, and other stakeholders in a change effort can
use this tool to guide the implementation of a new project
or idea. Individual stakeholders can use it to take a quick
snapshot and quickly pinpoint areas of strengths and weaknesses.
However, it will probably be most useful if project teams use
the tool when meeting together as a focus for planning and
discussion. |
| top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Why Should We Use
the Change Tool? |
| |
|
The Change tools provides a quick, easy way to
take a snapshot of organizational climate that can be used
to help the organization and a proposed innovation come together
effectively and with a minimum of stress.
First, the tools can be used: |
| |
|
• |
In planning as a prescriptive tool
by highlighting if and where attention needs to be focused
before even introducing a proposed change to an organization; |
| |
|
• |
During the implementation phase, it can be used as a
diagnostic tool to identify both problem
areas and areas of strength to build on; |
| |
|
• |
At any stage, including final evaluation and documentation,
it can be used as a descriptive tool
to capture aspects of the project and document progress over
time toward the goal of institutionalization. |
| top |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
How and When Should
We Use the Change Tools? |
| |
|
We suggest using Creating
Change initially when you are getting ready to start
a project or introduce an innovation. Use the 0 – 4
Rating Scale to describe the degree to which your organization
fits that characteristic or element. If you wish, you can
provide more detail about your organization and that characteristic
in the space provided for comments
Over time and with additional administrations, you will
probably see a trend as your ratings move from the 0 – 2
scale to include ratings of 3 – 4. When you see a definite
trend in your ratings toward higher numbers, use the Indicators
of Sustained Change to assess whether and when your project
or innovation has been institutionalized into the life of
the organization.
There are no wrong or right answers to this assessment,
just indicators of where your organization is at a given
point in time relative to the project, idea, or innovation
you are introducing and implementing, based on the perceptions
of those completing the assessment. You may want to revisit
an earlier administration of the assessment (particularly
the comments section) and compare it to a current assessment,
to determine progress and changes that have occurred over
time.
While individuals can use this assessment informally at
any time in a project to gain a quick snapshot of strengths
and weaknesses, its power lies in its use as a shared vehicle
by members of the project team. When used as part of a group
process for a variety of role members (project leaders, evaluators,
participants, etc.), teams can use it to foster discussion,
identify where to focus limited resources, build consensus,
identify where there are different perceptions of progress
based on position or role group, aid in planning, indicate
areas that need work, and document progress and success.
The important thing is to use this tool and related activities
in ways that make sense for you and your team, following
the advice of one participant in an innovative project implementation, “You’ve
got to understand the life cycle of the organization and
how and when it can do things.” The tools can be used
as: |
| |
|
• |
A conversational framework to initiate or adapt a
new PT3 project or innovation at an organization; |
| |
|
• |
A conceptual framework for selecting tools,
instruments, and resources for addressing change efforts; |
| |
|
• |
An evaluation framework for designing and
carrying out formative and summative evaluation of new and/or
PT3 projects or innovations (such as helping an administrator
to gather baseline data related to project implementation); |
| |
|
• |
An implementation framework to integrate
and use as an overall planning, implementation, and evaluation
tool for project growth and development, and |
| |
|
• |
A meta-analysis framework to identify, compare
and contrast change processes and efforts across projects on
common strands. |
| top |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The Critical Questions
for Planning Change |
| |
|
The tools provide opportunities to reflect on
elements that are related to answering the following questions: |
| |
|
1. |
What is the current organizational culture and what is its
impact on the institution? What transformational strategies
are essential for the planned innovation? What aspects of the
culture need to change or can be used to support the change? |
| |
|
2. |
What is the purpose of the project? What are the intended
outcomes and benchmarks? How does this innovation complement
the larger organizational vision? |
| |
|
3. |
Who is working together for change? Are all stakeholders
involved or represented equitably? |
| |
|
4. |
What is the process? What design process and conceptual framework
is included in your plan for change? Does the process reflect
the vision and the values of the innovation? |
| |
|
5. |
How are you analyzing and preparing the environment for change? |
| |
|
6. |
How are you helping people adopt/adapt the innovation? |
| |
|
7. |
What is the evidence of achievement and learning? (i.e. for
K-12 students, for performance of teacher candidates) |
| |
|
8. |
What indicators show that the change has been institutionalized? |
| |
|
9. |
What are the key factors for success in your project? |
| |
|
10. |
What are the visible outcomes of the project? What are the
benchmarks? (Important for marketing and dissemination) |
| top |
|
|
 |
| This Module and the Change Tools were developed
by Nancy Gadzuk and Sheila Cassidy. Additional information
and resources will be available in January 2004. |
| |
|
|
|
BACK |